Owner Earnings Formula – Part 1/2

Owner Earnings Formula - Part 1

How Much is a Company Really Making for its Owners?

Often enough, you hear people discuss stock market prices. You hear them speculating whether it will go up or down, and even why. You are bombarded by news, with percentage points a company gained or lost. For God’s sake, even on a MacBook, you get the stock tickers moving from red to green, and back to red pretty much every minute!

And there you see it.

AEX gained +1% today.

NASDAQ closed at -0.3%.

Amazon sells now at $2,000!

Wow. Let’s pause for a second.

Say that Amazon is indeed selling at $2,000. So what? 

Would you buy it? Is that too high? Too low? Is that a fair price? How do you know?

That’s the question we’re gonna try to answer with this series of articles on the Owner Earnings Formula (Part 1, Part 2 and Real Life Assessment), in this blog article. How do you know what’s a fair price for a company based on what they’re actually making? It can be any company, in principle, but I’ll focus on established public companies because of all the public information available on them.

There are many answers to this question. But let me start by a classic from Berkshire Hathaway’s investment philosophy: the owner earnings formula.

Little side note here, for those of you who might not know. Berkshire Hathaway is Warren Buffet and Charlie Munger’s investment company. Arguably the most successful investment company in this world. Buffet has, every year since 1977, shared bits and pieces of his investment philosophy in his letters to shareholders. The capitalization pricing method is a part of his overarching investment philosophy.

The Owner Earnings Formula From Berkshire’s 1986 Letter to Shareholders

In 1986 Berkshire bought an Ohio-based branding and manufacturing (private) firm called Scott Fetzer Company. According to Berkshire’s analyses, Scott Fetzer’s was a once in a lifetime deal perhaps except for the total acquisition size, which they would have like to be higher for tax purposes. But that’s another discussion, maybe for another article.

In the 1986 letter, Buffet presents the Scott Fetzer’s finances, the GAAP and non-GAAP accounting reports and the estimation of the acquisition price based on what Buffet calls owner earnings. This is to justify the acquisition to the shareholders and try to answer the question: “how much money did the acquisition make for us?”Before we get to that question, let’s clarify an odd abbreviation that just popped up in the paragraph before. GAAP.

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

GAAP is short for Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. These principles are adopted by the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) to paint a “clear” picture of a company’s financial performance to its investors. I said “clear”, because accounting is more of an art form, with its acrobatics and tricks, and as a result understanding financial performance can be a lot more difficult than you might think. Let’s leave them aside for a second and go back to our branding and manufacturing company: Scott Fetzer’s. You’ll see GAAP earnings and other financial metrics on your way to calculating the owner earnings.

Net Income and Accounting Tricks

One more time, the question here is – how much money did the acquisition make for the shareholders? Or in other words – how much money did the company make?

But, wait a second. Isn’t net income the answer to the question? Well, that’s GAAP. But the thing is, there’s many ways to get to that number with smart accounting tricks.

Look at the numbers below, reported in the 1986 letter to shareholders.

($ in thousands)

Company A

Company B

Revenues

$ 677,240

$ 677,240

Costs of Goods Sold

$ 349,471

$ 359,504

·       Historical costs

$ 341,170

$ 341,170

·       Special non-cash inventory

$ 4,979

·       Depreciation

$ 8,301

$ 13,355

Gross Profits

$ 327,769

317,736

Selling and Admin Expenses

$ 260,286

$ 260,286

Amortization of Goodwill

$ 595

Operating Profits

$ 67,483

$ 56,855

Other Income, Net

$ 4,135

$ 4,135

Pre-Tax Income

$ 71,618

$ 60,990

Deferred taxes

$ 31,387

$ 32,385

Non-cash Allocation Adj.

$ 998

Net Income

$ 40,231

$ 28,605

Do you want to know the weird thing? Company A and B are the same company: Scott Fetzer’s?! Just different accounting principles used, both GAAP. So, once again, how much money is the company actually making? Is it making $ 40 million dollars or $ 28? That’s a big difference!

Owner Earnings Formula

This is where owner earnings come in pretty darn handy to clarify this financial mess. Owner earnings are, quoting from the 1986 letter to shareholders:

  • the reported earnings (aka net income) +
  • depreciation, depletion, amortization and certain other non-cash charges –
  • the average annual amount of capitalized expenditures for plan and equipment etc. that the business requires to fully maintain its competitive position and unit volume.

Woah. OK. That was a mouthful, I know. Let’s break it down and translate it to English…

Reported Earnings

Easy, right? We know that. It’s the net income of company A and B. Fine. Next.

Depreciation, Depletion, Amortization …

This requires some explanation.

Every company owns assets and liabilities. By definition, these are things that either put money in the company’s pocket (assets) or not (liabilities). The net change is taken into account in the owner earnings!

So, taking a look at the Scott Fetzer’s financial results, we see this:

 

Company A

Company B

Depreciation

$ 8,301

$ 13,335

Amortization

$ 595

Other non-cash charges

$ 5977

The average amount of capital expenditures for maintenance

This is the most difficult one. First of all, capital expenditures (or also called Purchase of Property and Equipment) are funds used by a company to grow and maintain its operations. Here we need to estimate what part of that is used to maintain the operations. The crazy thing is, that the maintenance capital expenditure is NOT GAAP?!

So how do you guess that?

Here’s a little trick I use.

Question # 1 – Do I understand the business well enough to either estimate it myself?

Question # 2 – Do I find enough explanatory notes in the annual report explaining how the company used the total capital?

If the answer to both questions is NO, then I take the whole Purchase of Property and Equipment value. Just to be conservative!

For Scott Fetzer’s Berkshire estimates the maintenance capital expenditures at around $ 10 millions (or quoting “very close to $ 8.3 M, and much lower than $ 19.9 M).

Final Price – Scott Fetzer’s Owner Earnings in 1986

So, putting everything together, how much did Scott Fetzer’s make in 1986? What were their owner earnings?

 

Company A

Company B

Reported Income, Net

$ 40,231

$ 28,605

Depreciation

$ 8,301

$ 13,335

Amortization

$ 595

Other non-cash charges

$ 5977

Maintenance CapEx

$ (10,000)

$ (10,000)

Owner Earnings

$ 38,532

$ 38,532

Well, look at that! All of a sudden Company A and Company B are making the SAME amount of money for shareholders. What a surprise – since they’re the SAME company!!!

Despite the fact that the last piece of the puzzle, namely the maintenance capital expenditures, are a tough number to estimate, the owner earnings are a much better way to represent the real company earnings, or in other words the real value of the company.

The motto here is, I’d much rather be vaguely right than precisely wrong. So forget the GAAP metrics and focus on what matters – owner earnings.

That’s all for Part 1. Let is sink in and get started tomorrow with Part 2 where we look at owner earnings for public companies and the estimation of a fair price!

Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest developments in the stock and crypto market., fund, and crypto market.

Disclosure

These are unqualified opinions, and this newsletter, is meant for informational purposes only. It is not meant to serve as investment advice. Please consult with your investment, tax, or legal advisor, and do your own research.

All Seasons Investment Portfolio

What is the All Seasons Investment Portfolio?

So what exactly is an investment portfolio for all seasons? The All Season Portfolio, or also called the “All Weathers”, is the long-term investment strategy designed by the greatest investor of modern times: Ray Dalio at Bridgewater Associates. You can find his life and investment philosophy in his book Principles. Ray Dalio was actually to first one to use this investment strategy. Nowadays, in the investment jargon, investors call it risk-parity investing

Why is this portfolio so interesting?

The idea behind the All Weathers is based on three elements:

  1. balanced on risk,
  2. minimum transactions per year,
  3. long-term growth.

What Assets Are in My Investment Portfolio?

A risk-balanced investment portfolio is a mix of financial assets that are balanced based on their level of risk. Here’s how an initial risk-balanced portfolio looks like if we only consider stocks, bonds, commodities and gold.

  • About half of your portfolio is in bonds (a mix of long-and medium-term).
  • About 30% is on index funds.
  • The rest is divided between commodities and gold.
Actually, the 30% may also be spread between index funds and single companies, or even be invested all on single companies. However, I will not go deeper on that now. Creating an investment portfolio with single companies requires a lot more work! If you wanna know more, check out these articles: Owner Earnings Part 1 and Part 2.

How to Manage your Portfolio

You can manage this portfolio is basically two ways: 

  • passively – as in you put it together once, and keep funding it regularly (for example, monthly),
  • actively – you start understanding macroeconomic trends well enough to be able to adjust the portfolio based on some high-level metrics like interest rates, inflation etc.

The passive management is a more laid back way to management of your portfolio. Here you would adjust the starting percentages 1 to 2 times a year together with your financial advisor. The passive management may be a great way to go if you are not planning to be put in too much work in your portfolio. It gives you modest returns and lower transaction fees! By reducing the number and frequency of transactions, you are reducing the amount of fees that are taking a bite at your profits on the long run!

When you are not updating your portfolio, just forget about it! This portfolio is for the long-term which requires a solid emotional stability to be able to deal with whatever is happening to the market at any given moment.

An active management of this portfolio requires more work on your side.

Relevant Macroeconomic Trends

Understanding the macroeconomic trends, means you need to study the world politics a bit closer with particular focus on the policies. Important players to keep an eye on are central banks, since they have the control on the interest rates, and the amount of money in circulation in the economy. In general, understanding macroeconomic trends means understanding:

  • credit,
  • debit,
  • interest rates, and
  • inflation.

Why is all this important?

Let me give you a few high-level examples.

In periods when the interest rates are low (that is, approaching zero), credit is easily available. With credit being easily available, more money is circulating in the economy (that is, higher inflation). Since one people’s spendings are another’s income, the economy rises and markets get more speculative creating the famous bubble. In such periods, stocks tend to perform better than bonds and commodities. If you are able to understand macroeconomics, and the relationship between credit and debit, you may adjust your portfolio accordingly for higher returns. 

If you got lost in this last part on the macroeconomics, don’t worry. There’s an article 100% dedicated to this topic based on Ray Dalio’s 30 minutes insightful video on How the Economic Machine Works. I’m attaching the video here, if you are interested to dig deeper on this.

Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest developments in the stock and crypto market., fund, and crypto market.

Disclosure

These are unqualified opinions, and this newsletter, is meant for informational purposes only. It is not meant to serve as investment advice. Please consult with your investment, tax, or legal advisor, and do your own research.